An ongoing discussion of the intersection of my roles of father, naval officer, and citizen. And how I can be better at all three.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Much Thanks
I'm fortunate this year that life has slowed down enough for me to give serious thought to what I'm thankful for:
- A house that's filled with laughter.
- At 38, I still have the same job I dreamed about since I was seven.
- An amazing wife who knows all too well that this dream job isn't always convenient, yet supports me nonetheless.
- Therapists and educators who are collaborating, cooperating, and doing everything they can to help my son lead as typical a life as possible.
- The excited cheers that greet me when I get home after a long day.
- The chance to live part of my life in a place as sublimely beautiful as the Pacific Northwest.
- Parents and a sister whose love and influence are always with me, even when they're not.
- Living in an incredible time when everything seems possible and old friends are only a click away.
- The opportunity and privilege to serve this great country of ours.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Leadership, at Home and at Sea
As I wrote in the introduction to
this blog, I truly believe that the practice of leadership has certain aspects
that are universal in application, even toward the seemingly disparate jobs of
father and military officer. I often
ponder how I can leverage and mutually reinforce these two leadership roles,
without treating my children like subordinates or my subordinates like
children. Fortunately, I have two great
exemplars in this pursuit. My father and
brother-in-law (both of them fellow naval officers) managed to set and enforce
high standards both at work and at home, and without the use of a boatswain
pipe like Georg von Trapp.
So here are some specific examples of how each role has
influence the other. This is certainly
not an exhaustive list. I expect that
future posts will build and expand on this concept.
What the military has taught me about being a parent:
-Start with the end
in mind. A classic from Stephen Covey. Like one of my mentors often said, “If you
don’t know where you’re going, any road will get your there. “ Military planning efforts, whether for a
theater campaign or one-time airstrike, focus first on the objectives and end
states, to ensure that all subsequent decisions about courses of action,
assigned tasks, and prioritization of resources will ultimately support the
attainment of the desired goal. The same
principles apply to parenting. What kind of adults do I want my children to grow up to be? What values and traits do I hope to instill? What types of decisions do I want them to make
even when I’m not around?
-It’s not a
popularity contest. “Better to be
respected than liked” is an adage I learned as a young naval officer. This doesn’t mean “go out of your way to piss
people off” but leadership involves
getting people to do things they don’t want to do. (Otherwise, they wouldn’t
need a leader) It entails motivating people to perform beyond what they may
believe possible of themselves. This is
challenging. It is much easier to accept
standards that subordinates think are reasonable and comfortable, and let those
become the default setting for expected behavior. As a
parent, I must fight similar temptations to be the best friend instead of the
leader. I have to ensure I consistently
give my children what they need instead of regularly allowing what they want.
-Mistakes are the
best teachers. In a military that
has increasingly become “zero-defect” in terms of expectations, it is important
to remember that mistakes are a necessary facet of learning. Some of my best commanding officers gave me
the latitude to make mistakes, knowing that was the only way I was going to
gain experience and confidence. I think
the same applies to raising children.
This doesn’t mean as a military leader or as a parent, that I shrug my
shoulders and say, “mistakes happen.” But I have to be able to tell the
difference between a premeditated breach of the rules and a well-intentioned mistake. If it’s the former, I provide appropriate discipline. If the latter then I counsel and assist in dissecting
the incident for lessons to learn. With
regards to parenting, I have much to learn.
Too often I am quick to jump in and help my children do something
“perfectly”, instead of giving them the space to try, fail, and then try again.
The important thing, whether it’s in the ready room or the living room, is for
me to foster an environment where
everyone feels comfortable admitting to mistakes and learning from them.
What parenting has taught me about being a military
leader:
-Embrace the chaos. I like order and organization. It’s one of the many reasons I was attracted
to a career in the military. And my time
in the military has reinforced that need for order. Although being organized serves me well both
as an officer and as a parent (all praise to checklists and routines), I also
have to be able to thrive in a chaotic environment. More than anything, being a father of four
has taught me how to cope with noise and entropy: The near-constant chatter at
the dinner table after a long day at work.
The clamor of conflicting demands from multiple sources. The minefield
of a carpet strewn with legos and dolls.
All of this will serve me well at work, where I must separate the signal
from the noise and focus on what’s truly important.
-Be Patient. I’ve never been a patient person, and
life in the military has not changed that much.
We tend to have a bias towards action.
We loathe inaction. And yet parenting requires the patience of
Gandhi. As we watch our child slowly
putting on his shoes, we must fight the urge to put them on for him. As we help with math homework, we must let
them reach the right answer on their own. At home and at work, my efforts won’t always yield immediate results. I have to let things develop.
-It’s not about me. When I was a brand-new father, a
colleague (himself a father of seven) told me that parenting had taught him
just how selfish a person he could be. I
am reminded of that marvelous statement every time I find myself chafing at the
tedium of getting the baby back to sleep or listening to one more Wiggles song. (Ah, the irony of being annoyed by my
children while writing my blog about fatherhood….) Parenting
is the ultimate example of servant
leadership, but my role as a naval officer requires the same selflessness. I must remember that my energies should
always be focused towards ensuring my Sailors have the resources they need to
accomplish the mission and then recognizing their tireless efforts. Or as Lao-tzu wrote over 2500 years ago,
‘When the Master governs, the people are hardly aware he exists…The Master
doesn’t talk, he acts. When his work is
done, the people say, ‘Amazing: we did it, all by ourselves!”[1]
[1]
Lao-tzu, Tao Te Ching: A New English Version, trans. Steven Mitchell
(New York: Harper Perennial, 1988)
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Being Present
A few weekends ago, my wife and I
were at our community pool with our children.
As often happens, a neighborhood child swam over and started talking to
us. No introduction, no befriending my
daughter with “do you want to play with me?” he simply integrated himself into
our ongoing activities. We certainly
accommodated him, asked his name and introduced him to our children, and
encouraged him to join us. But he
quickly became a distraction, as he vied for our attention or aggressively
tried to play with our youngest (who cannot swim). This would have been a great time for his
parents to join us in the pool and provide some oversight, but they were too busy
lounging on the deck and talking on their phones. Once or twice they called to their son to
tell him stop a particular behavior, but beyond that they couldn’t be
bothered. Clearly, the child was seeking
much-needed attention. Later, as we
left the pool, I felt smugly superior to these lazy, selfish parents. Here I was, spending time with my own three
children, and still had the energy and patience to deal with someone else’s,
who were too rude and self-absorbed to even say thank you.
Later in the day, that
self-righteousness ended abruptly as I caught myself so absorbed in reading an
article on my iPad that I didn’t realize my son had been vying for my
attention. He ultimately got it, but
only by taking flour out of the pantry
and dumping it all over the kitchen floor. (I would love to tell you the article in question was an analysis of the current the situation in Syria, but I'm guessing it dealt with either a) celebrities, b) farts or c) both a and b.) Sure, I do a great job in public of playing with my children, looking
out for their safety, ensuring they’re not bothering anyone else. But back at home, it’s a different story. Despite all the time I spend away from my
family, whether at work, on travel, or on deployment, when I get back home I spend an awful lot of time reading books and
articles, checking Facebook and Twitter, watching television. I may be home, but I am not fully present.
It’s not social media that’s to
blame, or technology in general. I truly
believe that advances in connectivity have made life better for us in this
modern age. But even if I didn’t have a
tablet or smartphone on me at all times, I would still be lost in my own
thoughts or busy doing chores around the house.
Because let’s be honest, spending time with children, even your own children, is not always intellectually stimulating. (Let's be more honest: it can be downright mind-numbing, and the psychic rewards of spending time with your children don't come as quickly as the psychic rewards for other, more selfish activities.) Sure, rough-housing and tickling is fun, as they
laugh uncontrollably. But the quieter
moments, when they need me to get down on the floor and join their game, or jump-start some imaginative fort or pirate ship building with sofa cushions, or to quote a good friend, “to
not just play, but be playful,” that’s the hard part. That’s when the mind wanders to seemingly
more pressing matters: the issue at
work, the memo that needs revision, the scandal in the news, the blog topic
waiting to be explored...
I’m not suggesting that I need to
be fully immersed in my children’s activities every second of the day. Certainly they need space to play on their
own, to let their imaginations flourish and to learn how not be bored, without
my constant interaction. But my default
setting is “go play, Daddy is reading something right now,” when that should be
the exception, only when each child is at a point where they need down time.
Making myself “present” should
extend beyond parenting as well. How often during conversations with co-workers
do I quickly tune out and mentally review my to-do list for the day? So immersed in seemingly urgent “inbox maintenance”
and “task completion”, I lose sight of what’s truly important, making real
connections with those around me.
As an introvert, I understand that
my default setting is to pull away, to re-charge. And that’s fine, but I must also be prepared
to re-engage with my full attention. As
soon as my child, my wife, my co-worker seeks me out, I need to put down the
Ipad, or minimize the Outlook window, and be present.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
The Sound of Freedom
Recently, a
citizen of Coupeville, Washington wrote a letter
to the Whidbey News-Times. She voiced an
often-heard complaint that the jets from the nearby Naval Air
Station make too much noise and are disruptive to the lives of the local residents. Specifically, she expressed concern about
talk of expanded hours for training and suggested the U.S Navy should be more
considerate. “Listen
up, Navy: We pay taxes here. I suspect you don’t. We aren’t your guests. In
reality, you are ours.”
As one
would imagine, the response from local service members and their families was
fast and overwhelming. Many comments on
the paper’s website were polite but firm in their support for the training
flights. Unfortunately, some were inappropriate, rude, vulgar, and even threatening. The News-Times shut down the
comments section because their small staff could not feasibly review all comments
and delete only the inappropriate ones.
Facebook
and Letters to the Editor continue to remain available forums for comment on the issue.
At issue
are the Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLP) flights that the EA-6B Prowler and EA-18G Growler squadrons conduct as part of their pre-deployment training cycle. Both at the main air station in Oak Harbor
and an outlying field in Coupeville, aircrew practice the demanding task of
landing on an aircraft carrier. The
runway has a small rectangle painted on it (the same size as the landing area
on the ship) and the same optical landing
system, or “ball”, that the pilots use to fly the correct glideslope all
the way to touchdown. These flights on
land are essential for aircrew to learn and retain the proper muscle movements,
instrument scan, crew coordination, and communications required for flawless
execution at sea. As the saying goes, amateurs
practice until they get it right, but professionals practice until they can’t get it wrong.
To be
honest, the flights do produce a lot of noise and it can be annoying when you
are sitting at home (even for fellow aviators).
The problem is especially acute in Whidbey during summertime, where
because of the high latitude, the sun may not fully set until 10:30 pm, forcing
night training to be conducted until two or three in the morning. Noise complaints are a particularly
contentious topic because over the years, a few residents have taken extreme
measures to display their annoyance: spotlights, lasers, and fireworks aimed at
the aircraft. Such acts have the effect
of not just annoying the aircrew, but of disorienting them, putting their lives
and local residents at risk. (Full disclosure: I have spent nine years stationed at Whidbey Island, have conducted countless FCLP events, and have had spotlights and fireworks directed at my aircraft.)
“The Sound
of Freedom” is the common phrase we use to defend the noise, the idea being that the annoyance is a small price to pay for the liberties we all enjoy as Americans. Those liberties, of course, include
freedom of speech, and the author of the letter in question has a right to voice
her opinion, no matter how rude or ill-informed, and the News-Times has the
right to publish it.
The public,
including the military community, have the right to respond, no matter how rude or
ill-informed. No one, however, has the
right to make threats, or to harass her on the phone and by drive by her house honking
the horn repeatedly. I am pleased that local
and military authorities are investigating such threats and actions.
When discussing the jet noise, it is
not enough to say, “the military protects our freedom, therefore anything the
military does to protect that freedom is justified”. The military
is part of the federal government. Read
that sentence in quotes again, but replace “military” with “government” and see if it doesn't give you pause. Such sentiments are dangerous, and has led Americans to accept unconstitutional government actions such as the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, the internment
of Americans of Japanese descent during World War Two, and the torture of
detainees during the last decade.
The Navy
has the responsibility to be good stewards of the taxpayers’ money and the
environment, and to be courteous neighbors, and in my experience it does. The squadrons conduct the minimum number of flights to reach the
required proficiency. (Believe me, no
one wants to do more FLCPs than necessary)
To further minimize the impact, the air station puts limits to the
number of aircraft in the pattern and where they can fly, avoiding over-flight
of the most populous areas, even if that impacts the realism of flight pattern
as compared to what is actually executed when at the aircraft carrier.
Notice in
the above paragraph, I said “neighbors” and not “guests”. The
part of the letter that prompted such a vociferous response from the
sailor-citizens and retirees in the community is the fact that she considers
“the navy” to be “guests” who don’t pay taxes. Of course service members pay taxes: on their
income, on their property, and on the items they buy at the store. For the author to refer to sailor-citizens as guests and not
neighbors and fellow residents was incredibly thoughtless.
One
apologist on Facebook said that the author was calling the “Navy” as an
institution the guest, since it doesn’t pay property tax on the land upon which
the air station was built. That
interpretation of the letter doesn’t make sense based on the plural personal pronouns
(“they”, “their”) the author used to
describe “the navy, as in a group of individuals, instead of using “it” to
describe the institution. Besides, even
if she was complaining about the U.S. Navy as an institution, for it to pay
property taxes defies logic. That would
be like asking the fire or police department to pay property taxes. Or asking them to not use their sirens at
night, so that citizens not be disturbed.
Some of the
respondents made equally rude statements that Oak Harbor and surrounding towns
wouldn’t exist if not for the economic boon provided by the air station and its
servicemembers and families. Although
the town would be smaller, with a very different economy, to say that the town
would disappear is disrespectful to all the hardworking residents of Oak
Harbor, the vast majority of whom are incredibly supportive of the air station
and its mission.
Ultimately,
the most important take away from this whole incident is that the “sound of freedom”
should be more than just jets flying overhead.
It should be the sound of civil discourse; the sound of citizens exercising
their right to put forth arguments that are passionate yet free from the invective,
and vitriol that we see far to much of these days.
Disclaimer: This essay is my personal opinion, and in no way represents the official position of the U.S. Navy or the Department of Defense.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Story Telling Made Simple
The five words that can strike fear in any father’s heart at
bedtime: “Daddy, tell me a story.” At the end of a long and stressful day,
coming up with an original story that will captivate your child seems
unbelievably challenging. But you don’t
have to be a playwright to create an entertaining story. Here a few simple tips:
Start with the end in
mind. The great thing about making
up a story is that you get to choose the moral to impart, so think of this
first. Once you come up with a simple
lesson like “Be yourself” or “Don’t give up”, the plot will write itself. Fill the story with memorable characters
(silly names, funny voices) and put them in a situation that will eventually teach them the moral you chose.
Be derivative. Your child will not check your sources or
call the intellectual property police. In
fact, they will gain comfort from familiar story lines. Draw morals and plots from stories you know,
like “The Little Engine That Could”, “The
Ant and the Grasshopper”, or in my daughter’s case, “Return of the Jedi”.
Remember the rule of threes. Children and adults alike are drawn to ideas
and stories that come in groups of threes.
Have your main character attempt something three times, or meet three
different characters that help solve their problem.
Foster creativity. Encourage your child to participate by letting
them fill in details like the names of the characters or where the story takes
place. As they get older, gradually have
them provide more and more of the storyline.
Introduce new concepts. Use story time as an opportunity to teach
your children about geography, history, science, or languages. Set your tale in a foreign country or a
different century. Make your story about
an airplane that’s lost its lift. Have a
character speak a few simple words in French or Japanese.
With last night’s story, I found myself using all of these
tips. I started with the simple moral: “It’s
good to try new foods”. Spying my
daughter’s pillow pet, I created a tale about a purple unicorn who lived in
France. “Purple” (my daughter chose the
name) only liked to eat dandelions, despite her three friends, in turn,
offering her carrots, potatoes, and truffles.
But soon she ate all the dandelions in her pasture, and all the
dandelions in the surrounding pastures.
She looked and looked for more dandelions, but there were none. So she tried the carrots, and at first she
didn’t like them because they weren’t anything like her favorite
dandelions. But soon she thought they
were quite tasty, and then she quickly tried potatoes and truffles, and loved
them too. Her three friends were so
happy that they could share their favorite foods with her.
Nothing complicated, but it kept her attention and kept her
involved as she suggested plot points and asked questions like “what’s a truffle?”
Remember, the day will all too quickly arrive when your
child feels too old for being tucked in and told bedtime stories. But in this small window of time, you will
create a lifetime of cherished memories.
Even into adulthood, your children will draw comfort from the memory of
this shared bedtime ritual.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Coping with the Chaos
Eight months ago, our son turned three. The warning signs were disparate and insidious. Many behaviors were perfectly typical for a boy that age: repetitive activity, lining up toys, slower than his sister in learning to talk, fascinated more with objects than people, not acknowledging when we called his name. These characteristics were combined with glimpses of incredible brilliance: memorizing the alphabet, quickly solving puzzles, doing basic math, and reading words he had never seen before.
His atypical behavior came into stark relief, however, when we put him in school. He isolated himself from peers by hiding under desks and chairs. His seemingly willful disobedience was something far worse: he was oblivious to what his parents and teachers wanted him to do. Crowds and loud noises quickly over stimulated him. We realized that his repetitive behaviors and obsession with numbers and letters were a way to seek refuge from chaos. And so our research began. Books, articles, and discussions with friends gave credence to our suspicions. The more we learned, the more we recognized other signs that we had shrugged off as “quirkiness”.
But we have also noticed behaviors that are simply who he is: his tremendous empathy when one of his siblings cries, his affectionate bear hugs, and his skill in navigating the Ipad. As frustrating as he can be sometimes, his atypical personality and thought processes will be significant assets to him, and I would not want my son to be anyone else. Our job as parents is to help him alleviate his current frustrations and anxiety by learning to communicate effectively and to cope with the chaos comes with being part of society.
I am grateful for many things: our son got an early diagnosis, he is making great progress through various therapies, and he has a mother who has demonstrated unflagging optimism, patience and resolve in the face of this challenge. My wife, by expertly achieving the precious balance of accepting our son for who he is and yet tackling his autism head-on, has taught me a great deal about parenting, love, and leadership.
Sunday, March 18, 2012
The Movie with a Thousand Questions
It started innocently enough. I introduced my five-year-old daughter to Star Wars Legos on the Wii. I figured that it would be a fun activity we could share, and for a video game, it actually does a good job of promoting teamwork and problem solving. She loved it, and by the third level, she wanted to watch the movies. I initially hesitated; the violence of the movies is far more intense than seeing Lego characters disassemble when hit with a light saber. I relented, however, once I remembered that when I was her age, I saw “Empire Strikes Back” in the theater, and suffered no ill effects.
Now we have a problem. It’s not that “laser”, “shoot” and “kill” have been introduced to her vocabulary, although my wife is less than thrilled about that. The problem is that I’ve created a monster: she has become obsessed with Star Wars. I can’t go five minutes without being asked a Star Wars question: “Daddy, what color light saber does Ben Kenobi use? If Yoda taught everyone else to be a Jedi, who taught him? Why did Princess Leia call Han Solo a nerf herder? What’s a nerf herder?” She wants to watch the movies over and over again. She wants to watch all the bonus behind-the-scenes documentaries. Today at the zoo I heard her humming “The Imperial March” to herself.
I am finding numerous benefits to this pre-occupation with Star Wars, however. You have to know my daughter to truly appreciate the situation. She is not a tomboy by any stretch of the imagination. She loves the color pink, wearing nail polish, and anything that has to do with Disney Princesses. So I like that her fascination with Princess Leia and Queen Amidala, strong female characters that stand up for themselves and make their own decisions, provide a counterbalance to Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty. Tonight she wanted to know why there weren’t more female Jedi Knights in the movies.*
Besides adding a new dimension to our father-daughter bond, Star Wars provides an avenue for rather important conversations. When she asks how the Emperor could be bad when he seemed so nice in the first two episodes, I’m able to work in a discussion about avoiding strangers, no matter how friendly they might seem at first. Darth Vader saving Luke Skywalker at the end of “Return of the Jedi” led to a talk about how bad people can realize their mistakes and try to be good again. Not everyday you can have a conversation with your five-year-old about redemption, but if she can grasp that concept, then forgiving her little brothers will be that much easier as she gets older.
The obsession goes beyond the characters and the story. Half of her questions are about how the movies are made from a technical standpoint. “In that scene, is R2-D2 played by a little person or a robot? How do they make Jabba the Hut move?” You can imagine how excited she got when I told her that Yoda’s puppeteer also did Grover from Sesame Street. Last week a question about Queen Amidala led me once again to Wikipedia for the answer, and the article showed how her costumes were based on a picture of a 19th century Mongolian princess. She asked about the picture, and I attempted to explain “inspiration” and “influence”. She interjected, “Like how George Lucas saw that Japanese movie?” I was floored. She was referring to a brief clip of Kurosawa’s “Hidden Fortress” she saw during a documentary on the creation of Star Wars.
I know that all too soon she will outgrow this fascination with Star Wars. My hope is that it will grow into a larger interest in mythology, religion, politics, storytelling, and the human condition. If she enjoys discussing and dissecting the complicated web of characters, relationships and backstories that George Lucas has created, perhaps doing the same with the works of Homer, Shakespeare and Dickens will be just as interesting for her.
* If you have a similarly obsessed child whose questions go far beyond your circa 1983 knowledge of the Star Wars universe, I have found this website helpful: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)